""The total of my evidence is that Britain licensed an order of small arms ammunition.......
And that is the total evidence of YOUR information, it is all we both have
Out of which you have concluded (can't be bothered to do this in order any more).
The licence doesn't exist - don't believe everything you read in the press
It does exist but it was rescinded
It was issued but the shipment was never sent
It was sent far too early to be used in the fighting
It was sold to a private buyer
It was for sporting equipment
The ammunition was the wrong size to be used in Syrian weapons
And finally back to:
There is no evidence that a licence ever existed
The ammunition was the wrong size
Back on La Ronde - and so on, ad infinitum
You have now added to your contradictory makkie-ups that you never challenged the existence of the licencedenied that I have put up your saying the licence never existed AND I SHOULDN'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING IN THE PRESS.
If you haven't denied it, what should I not believe in the press?
Not bad for The total of my evidence is that Britain licensed an order of small arms ammunition.......
You are a bigger joke than your History Man mate - at least he sticks to one story - you have given over half a dozen here.
The licence for sniper ammunition exists - end of story - all the other excuses underline that you make things up on the spot, whether they relate to one another or are contradictory.
You have been crudely and ineptly making up a whole string of excuses for the sale of equipment to a mass murderer
Also sold by Britain was riot control equipment, armoured cars, tear gas and water cannon which we know to have ben used on the streets to quell demonstrators during the Arab Spring Protests BEFORE THIS SQUALID AFFAR BECAME A CIVIL WAR
Britain has been condemned world wide for selling CHEMICALS to this monster that could have been used to produce his stockpile of foul weapons.
The bottom line is that Britain sells weapons to whoever will buy them
End of...
Jim Carroll