Very complicated. Appendix A at the end of chapter 5 Makes the whole dilemma more readable
best to skip to : CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY OF PROVISIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS 89 Part I: Preliminary Issues 89 Provisional nature of recommendations 89 The need for a special regime 89 Differing regimes for sexual and non-sexual child abuse 89 The elimination of periods of limitation 89 Part II: Options for Reform 89 Option One: Test of "disability" Statute of Limitations (Amendment) Act, 2000 89 Option Two: Test of "discoverability" Statute of Limitations (Amendment) Act, 1991 89 Option Three: Presumption of incapability; the Ontario model 90 Option Four: Fixed period of time 90 Part III: Scope and Operation of the Test 90 Definition of "non-sexual abuse" 90 Mixed cases 91 The cause of action 91 Relationship of trust and dependency between the plaintiff and the defendant 91 Vicarious liability and liability of supervisory authorities 91 Retrospective effect of statutes of limitation 91 APPENDIX A: TABLE OF THE LAW OF LIMITATIONS OF OTHER JURISDICTIONS
APPENDIX B: LIST OF LAW REFORM COMMISSION'S PUBLICATIONS
The other 2 papers seem to echo and illustrate Business Insiders article ..... all worth a read