Subject: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Georgiansilver Date: 06 Apr 07 - 05:44 PM The reality of the invisibility cloak is coming:- how would you use it? Full details here |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Jean(eanjay) Date: 06 Apr 07 - 05:47 PM It would be good if you looked a real mess but just wanted to pop out to the shops and not be seen - I don't know what you'd do when it came time to pay though! |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Sorcha Date: 06 Apr 07 - 05:52 PM I heard about this months ago. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Little Hawk Date: 06 Apr 07 - 06:09 PM I can't think of any reason why I would use it. I bet the military people can, though. (sigh) |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: skipy Date: 06 Apr 07 - 06:29 PM I spend hours in the ladies showers at festivals! Next time that you are in one, wonder, just wonder! Skipy |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Peace Date: 06 Apr 07 - 06:30 PM "The reality of the invisibility cloak is coming:- how would you use it?" To confuse the dog. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Bill D Date: 06 Apr 07 - 06:54 PM Oh, I can just *IF* they ever actually manage this, there'll be more regulations than on booze & cell phones. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Peace Date: 06 Apr 07 - 06:57 PM Who they gonna arrest? |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: leeneia Date: 06 Apr 07 - 07:23 PM Have you ever been in a situation where you couldn't get a word in edgewise? Well, you had on a cloak of invisibility on then, but you were the only person who couldn't tell. It's the opposite of seeing a ghost. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Bill D Date: 06 Apr 07 - 07:30 PM I'll bet that invention, if allowed, would bring back corsets & girdles, as there would be SO many pinches happening. (that's the conservative form of the prediction) |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: John Hardly Date: 06 Apr 07 - 07:31 PM I've used one to navigate the mudcat for years. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Peace Date: 06 Apr 07 - 08:15 PM One warning: Remember the Cone of Silence. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Peace Date: 06 Apr 07 - 08:34 PM I have one question that is really bugging me. OK, so like you knaow about some people who have invisible friends. If we all wear these things, does that mean our invisible friends will be seen by others? This has far-reaching implications. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Charley Noble Date: 06 Apr 07 - 09:04 PM I can think of a lot of uses beyond the ones already mentioned. How about using one to exit a boring gathering of business associates or family members? My brother-in-law would love such a suit for deer hunting. Bank robbers would have a ball with them. Fine art thieves would be delighted. So would the CIA and the FBI. But I do wonder as does Peace above, what happens when everyone's invisible? Were we ever really here at all? Charley Noble |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: John Hardly Date: 06 Apr 07 - 09:06 PM When inivisibility cloaks are outlawed, only outlaws will be invisible. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Peace Date: 06 Apr 07 - 09:22 PM LOLOL |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Bill D Date: 06 Apr 07 - 09:41 PM Now if they could only get it to hide odors! |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Bee-dubya-ell Date: 06 Apr 07 - 09:44 PM The thing's a total waste! There's only one reason guys would want to use it, and that's to see naked women. But the thing only works for light of a single wavelength, not for white light (which is a mix of all colors in the visible spectrum). That means you'd need to find someplace where all the lighting is of a single non-white color, like red. And the only places I know of where all the lights are red are strip clubs. You don't need an invisibility cloak to see naked women in a strip club! All you need is a handful of $1.00 bills. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Georgiansilver Date: 07 Apr 07 - 05:10 AM At least we have most people looking lightheartedly at this invention but the sinister implications have also been picked up on....invisible war machines/men/armies......scary thought. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Jean(eanjay) Date: 07 Apr 07 - 05:14 AM It would be good in classrooms where discipline is poor - an invisible hand on the shoulder and "do as you're told". |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: John MacKenzie Date: 07 Apr 07 - 05:15 AM Just call yourself Guest, and you're invisible surely? G. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull Date: 07 Apr 07 - 05:31 AM i would go to a cake shop,and eat all there cakes. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: John MacKenzie Date: 07 Apr 07 - 05:43 AM Is that a doughnut, or a meringue? |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: skipy Date: 07 Apr 07 - 07:48 AM You where right first time! Skipy |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Gray D Date: 07 Apr 07 - 09:08 AM I've already got one of these. D@mned if I can find it, though. Gray D |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Ebbie Date: 07 Apr 07 - 02:23 PM lol, Gray D. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Peace Date: 07 Apr 07 - 02:26 PM I am gonna try mine on. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Peace Date: 07 Apr 07 - 02:26 PM |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Peace Date: 07 Apr 07 - 02:26 PM It works. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Jean(eanjay) Date: 07 Apr 07 - 02:27 PM Peace, you're invisible! |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Jean(eanjay) Date: 07 Apr 07 - 02:27 PM You're visible again! |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: John Hardly Date: 07 Apr 07 - 02:55 PM looking for an invisible dagger to go with the cloak. Does a Chinese frog cloak? |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Dickey Date: 07 Apr 07 - 09:20 PM I can't see it myself. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Charley Noble Date: 07 Apr 07 - 09:34 PM I bet that with an infrared scanner I'd be able to pick up someone lurking in an invisibility cloak. Of course I'd be a whole lot cheaper to use my faithful pitbull, if I had a faithful pitbull. Charley Noble |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Bill D Date: 07 Apr 07 - 09:38 PM I can do invisible writing Only the clever will be able to read this Hah! |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Bee-dubya-ell Date: 08 Apr 07 - 12:46 AM Hah! I can read your invisible writing, Bill, 'cause I have a Magic Decoder ring! I bought it in Bismark, North Decoder. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: GUEST,meself Date: 08 Apr 07 - 12:53 AM You would want to be sure to remember just where you hung up that invisibility cloak ... And it would not be recommended to just hand it the hostess to throw on the bed with the other cloaks. I'm not going to get one until they put out an invisibility hat to wear with it, and an invisibility walking stick. I wouldn't look my best, I'd feel undressed with just the cloak. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: JohnInKansas Date: 08 Apr 07 - 03:00 AM An unfortunate feature of the cloaking device reported in the article was fully documented in the research "bulletin" about a year ago, and has been true of all such devices reported (for different frequencies) over the past 20 years or so: While you are invisible inside your cloak you cannot see anything outside of your cloak. A coat of black paint does the same thing, for most of the "practical applications" mentioned above, doesn't it? John |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: John Hardly Date: 08 Apr 07 - 05:28 AM "While you are invisible inside your cloak you cannot see anything outside of your cloak. A coat of black paint does the same thing, for most of the "practical applications" mentioned above, doesn't it?" As does closing one's eyes. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Liz the Squeak Date: 08 Apr 07 - 05:56 AM Just make it look like a traffic stop sign... few enough people see those as it is. LTS |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Charley Noble Date: 08 Apr 07 - 10:59 AM My old man's invisible, What do you think about that? He wears an invisibility rain cloak, He wears an invisibility hat; He wears invisibility gloves, And he wears invisibility shoes, And every night when he comes home, He turns on the invisibility news! JohnInKansas- I can't see your point! ;~) Cheerily, Charley Noble |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: John Hardly Date: 08 Apr 07 - 11:46 AM ...one cloak, invisible, with liberty and justice for all. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Georgiansilver Date: 08 Apr 07 - 12:01 PM Perhaps the farmer who is being paid to keep no pigs could keep them but hide them...if he really wants to! |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Peace Date: 08 Apr 07 - 01:02 PM Yes, but his face rings a bell. Ba da da boom! |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Peace Date: 08 Apr 07 - 01:29 PM Is this the cannibis thread? |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Lonesome EJ Date: 08 Apr 07 - 01:51 PM Years ago, I went into a restaurant with my pal Bob, and as we waited a very long time for a waiter to show up, Bob said "you know, I have a secret power. I become invisible as soon as I enter a restaurant. What's more, anyone with me becomes invisible too!" At first I believed him, but since eventually a waiter spotted us and took our orders, I think we were merely translucent. Yes, I think this is the cannabis thread. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: GUEST,meself Date: 08 Apr 07 - 01:52 PM Apparently that thread is under the invisibility cloak ... |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Peace Date: 08 Apr 07 - 06:09 PM I am gonna put that cloak on for a while. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: John Hardly Date: 08 Apr 07 - 06:39 PM Zogg use invisibility club. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Amos Date: 08 Apr 07 - 10:46 PM What wavelength would you choose? If you put on eight of them one over the other could you get R, O, Y, G, B, I, V and infrared? Or would they cancel each other out? A |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Mo the caller Date: 09 Apr 07 - 05:46 AM I think H.G Wells has been here before us, though the cloak has the advantage of being removeable. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Charley Noble Date: 09 Apr 07 - 08:58 AM Maybe we should try out the "invisibility cloak" at Getaway. It's my understanding that it only works if the person to be so attired undresses first. Then we quickly hand them the cloak. I expect there will be quite a line-up to experience this cloak. Cheerily, Charley Noble |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Georgiansilver Date: 09 Apr 07 - 09:55 AM If the invisible man wore the cloak...would he still be invisible?? double negative and all that! |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Bill D Date: 09 Apr 07 - 10:17 AM "I expect there will be quite a line-up to experience this cloak." Not if it's ME they are testing it on. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Georgiansilver Date: 09 Apr 07 - 11:02 AM Can't see you doing that Bill! |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 09 Apr 07 - 11:08 AM How will they know where to line up? Don T. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Jeanie Date: 09 Apr 07 - 11:34 AM Ozzy Osbourne has already got his. Now you see him (now you don't) modelling it here: http://www.crystalinks.com/invisibility506.jpg "Sharon !!! Where the **** have I put my ****ing cloak ?!" - jeanie |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: John Hardly Date: 09 Apr 07 - 11:45 AM Invisibility Coke = 7UP |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Donuel Date: 09 Apr 07 - 01:37 PM A NEW and very different approach to invisibility is being tested using PLASMONICS. A special suit is not required. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Bill D Date: 09 Apr 07 - 02:21 PM "invisible" doesn't mean impermeable. I'd imagine widespread use of the cloak would lead to an increase in sales of spray paint, tasers, 10 foot poles and funny glasses meant to see weird light waves. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Georgiansilver Date: 09 Apr 07 - 03:25 PM Think of the implications of putting the cloak on inside out!!!! |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Peace Date: 09 Apr 07 - 03:31 PM Everybody except you would know where you are. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: leeneia Date: 09 Apr 07 - 11:52 PM Peace, you are in rare form today. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Gurney Date: 10 Apr 07 - 02:25 AM Didn't someone once sell the emperor invisible new clothes? Shops would have to put the ICs in boxes so that they could stocktake them. And to stop thieves taking their stock. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Georgiansilver Date: 10 Apr 07 - 05:47 AM Monitored, disposable camera inside each one should do the trick! |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: GUEST,petr Date: 10 Apr 07 - 08:42 PM nature has something better than an invisibility cloak. cuttlefish |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Charley Noble Date: 10 Apr 07 - 10:10 PM Yah, the cuttlefish are pretty neat, way evolved beyond us. You should see the fireworks when they get aroused. Charley Noble |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Gurney Date: 11 Apr 07 - 03:39 AM I didn't think they had evolved as far as fireworks, Charlie. Heh heh. I once saw a television scene where they had a chessboard in the bottom of a fishtank, and introduced a flounder/plaice/some kind if flatfish. S/he settled down and changed colour to blackish spots on a whitish background, spaced about right, too. Pretty impressive for someone who couldn't see the bottom without doing a somersault. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Charley Noble Date: 11 Apr 07 - 08:19 AM Them flounders can't change their patterns as fast as one of our presidential candidates. Charley Noble |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: GUEST,petr Date: 11 Apr 07 - 07:28 PM put the cuttlefish on a chessboard and it will try to match it but not only does it change colors - it also changes shape by extruding bumps etc.. not bad for a mollusk. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: Charley Noble Date: 12 Apr 07 - 07:29 PM Hey, it would be a shame if this thread died so soon. Charley Noble |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: frogprince Date: 12 Apr 07 - 10:49 PM Did you hear about the invisible Japanese frog? He cloaked. Nighty-night. |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: John Hardly Date: 13 Apr 07 - 06:42 AM yup |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: frogprince Date: 13 Apr 07 - 01:25 PM Oops, sorry, John H.; I should have realized a joke that brilliant couldn't have originated from my brain. : ) |
Subject: RE: BS: Invisibility cloak to be reality!!!! From: bobad Date: 13 Apr 07 - 01:34 PM "not bad for a mollusk." Not trying to be pedantic but I do believe that cuttlefish are cephalopods not mollusks. |